PRODRAFTSTATS™PRODRAFTSTATS™Four weeks in a row, our number for him has sat under it, and the gap is smaller than you’d guess.
Our Week 8 number for Trey McBride is 14.47. His season average is 17.18. He has made our tight-end list four weeks running, each time under his average. Why hasn't been measured. It covers one week, and Week 8 desk numbers are live, not sealed.
If you own Trey McBride, somebody in your league chat may have quoted his season average at you this month, maybe with a screenshot. Here is the quieter fact: our desk has put him on its weekly tight-end list four weeks running, and every time our number for him landed under that average. That is a price on one week, not a verdict on his job. It also isn’t a reason to panic or celebrate on Sunday. Our number for him in Week 8 is 14.47, against a season average of 17.18. It is a projection for one week with a wide spread around it, not a forecast of his score, and one week can land well above or well below it. The gap shrank from Week 5 to Week 8, and part of the reason is plain arithmetic that works in your favor when you argue with the guy in your chat. Nine names filled twenty slots on this list, and only one of them never left. The next section shows who, how far under, and what moved.
Week 4 carried a single tight-end row: Tucker Kraft at 7.95 against a 6.53 season average. From Week 5 on, the list named five tight ends a week. That is twenty slots across W5 to W8, and only nine players filled them.
McBride took four slots. Sam LaPorta and Tyler Warren took three each. George Kittle, Juwan Johnson, Isaiah Likely and Brock Bowers took two. Colston Loveland and Travis Kelce took one each. Kittle and Johnson dropped off after Week 6, Likely after Week 7. Bowers entered in Week 7 and stayed for Week 8. Kelce is new in Week 8 at 10.56 against a 12.38 average.
But a name on a featured list sounds like a call for a big week. The numbers say otherwise. On 19 of the 20 rows from W5 to W8, our projection sat below that player’s own average. The one exception was Loveland in Week 6, at 10.05 against 5.03.
That’s why McBride’s row is the one to watch. Here it is week by week:
| Week | Our number | His average | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| W5 | 13.34 | 19.70 | −6.36 |
| W6 | 13.31 | 17.30 | −3.99 |
| W7 | 12.65 | 18.16 | −5.51 |
| W8 | 14.47 | 17.18 | −2.71 |
Our number for him has run from 12.65 to 14.47, a range of 1.82 points, against season averages of 17.18 to 19.70. That is a single point projection, and no interval is shown here. A single week’s score can land well above or well below it.
So the gap was 3.65 points narrower in W8 than in W5 (6.36 minus 2.71). His average fell 2.52 (19.70 to 17.18) and our number rose 1.13 (13.34 to 14.47). The gap did not close in a straight line, though: it widened from W6 to W7.
Bowers moved the same direction over one week, but the comparison needs care. In W7 he was at 11.86 against a 23.73 average. In W8 he was at 14.81 against 20.55. His average fell 3.18 and our number rose 2.95. Each week’s gap is measured against a different average, so the W7 and W8 gaps are not a like-for-like move, and two points are not a trend.
The psychology on the other side is the law of small numbers. People treat a short sample as if it describes the whole player. One big afternoon starts to feel like his real level. One quiet afternoon starts to feel like a lost role. A small sample is real evidence, just less of it than it feels like.
Which means the two signals on this list should be read separately, and neither one measures role. We have no snap, target or route data behind this post. A repeat name means the desk’s tight-end screen flagged him that week, and each flag was written down before kickoff. The number beside his name is where we project him against his own average. Bowers and Kelce are the newest entries. Whether they return is something we can report, not something the data shows predicts anything yet.
This post states no results, because none exist yet for these weeks. Week 8 numbers are live desk numbers written Fri Oct 23, 9:08 AM ET, before kickoff, and not yet sealed as of Sat Oct 24, so quote the sealed copy when it lands, not this live one. The 2026 record starts at Week 2. Nothing here is betting advice, and nothing here creates a betting edge.
Send this to the league-chat member who thinks one box score settles a tight end’s role.
Source: ProDraftStats desk.
Four weeks running, W5 through W8. Nine names filled the list's twenty slots, and he is the only one who never left. Each time, our number sat under his season average.
No. On 19 of the 20 rows from W5 to W8, our projection sat below that player's own average. The one exception was Colston Loveland in W6. A flag is not a role read, and no snap, target or route data sits behind it.
The gap was −6.36 in W5, −3.99 in W6, −5.51 in W7 and −2.71 in W8. The W8 figure comes from live desk numbers that are not sealed. The projections are one-week estimates, not forecasts of his score.
ProDraftStats launches in 2027. Join the free waitlist.